On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 08:55:54AM +0100, Fabian Arrotin wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 02/12/14 03:10, Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 12:49:41AM +0000, Karanbir Singh wrote: > >> Reviving an old thread here, I think we've got quite a lot of > >> stuff going on around the project to benefit from a shared > >> calendar solution. > >> > >> Do we have a way forward on this ? if not, we can try and just > >> do something via a shared git repo or a hosted cal that can > >> publish an ics file ? > > > > I don't have the whole earlier thread handy (curse you mailman and > > your per-month archiving), but it'd be pretty great to collaborate > > with Fedocal here. > > > > And I guess it has a strong dependency on FAS ? (from what I can read > on http://fedocal.readthedocs.org/en/latest/usage.html) The question is what would you like to use as authentication/authorization mechanism? Fedora uses FedOAuth (now merged into Ipsilon) which does both the authentication and authorization. Ipsilon supports other backend that FAS such as ldap as well as local username/password/groups store (in a local DB). So you could use it with one backend now and move to something else later once you have made your choice. Pierre