On Dec 01 09:52, Jeff Sheltren wrote: > On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 9:36 AM, Brian Stinson <bstinson at ksu.edu> wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > I would like to start a discussion on where/how to ship the package > > building toolchain. Most of these tools shipped in EPEL, but deploying > > them to one of our repos would allow us to maintain our own patches if > > necessary and would eliminate any dependencies on 3rd party repositories > > for our core tools. > > > > I'd much rather not do this for a couple reasons: > 1. CentOS Extras shouldn't overlap with EPEL. > 2. If there are reasons to customize/patch some of these things for the > CentOS infrastructure, perhaps they belong in a new/separate repo -- > especially considering centos-extras is enabled by default. Good points. Would a separate cbs-tools repo, with a cbs-tools-release package in CentOS-Extras be acceptable? --Brian