On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 8:20 AM, Brian Stinson <bstinson at ksu.edu> wrote: > > > I'd much rather not do this for a couple reasons: > > 1. CentOS Extras shouldn't overlap with EPEL. > > 2. If there are reasons to customize/patch some of these things for the > > CentOS infrastructure, perhaps they belong in a new/separate repo -- > > especially considering centos-extras is enabled by default. > > Good points. Would a separate cbs-tools repo, with a cbs-tools-release > package in CentOS-Extras be acceptable? > > Sounds like a good approach to me. -Jeff -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20141204/34bfef58/attachment-0008.html>