On 04/12/14 16:20, Brian Stinson wrote: > On Dec 01 09:52, Jeff Sheltren wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 9:36 AM, Brian Stinson <bstinson at ksu.edu> wrote: >> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> I would like to start a discussion on where/how to ship the package >>> building toolchain. Most of these tools shipped in EPEL, but deploying >>> them to one of our repos would allow us to maintain our own patches if >>> necessary and would eliminate any dependencies on 3rd party repositories >>> for our core tools. >>> >> >> I'd much rather not do this for a couple reasons: >> 1. CentOS Extras shouldn't overlap with EPEL. >> 2. If there are reasons to customize/patch some of these things for the >> CentOS infrastructure, perhaps they belong in a new/separate repo -- >> especially considering centos-extras is enabled by default. > > Good points. Would a separate cbs-tools repo, with a cbs-tools-release > package in CentOS-Extras be acceptable? that might work, but why do we not want centos-extras to overlap EPEL ? Iirc, it already does this. - KB -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc