[CentOS-devel] Latest builds are now online 2014-06-25_build 4

Wed Jul 2 14:30:32 UTC 2014
Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com>

On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 4:52 AM, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org> wrote:
> On 07/02/2014 10:38 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>>> I am less opposed to these as they retain some semblance of a
>>> correlation to upstream 7.0, although presumably any release would now
>>> be .1407 rather than .1406 as we are now into July?
>> no it wont, we use the tag that matches upstream's release stamp, so
>> will stay 1406
> This is a great example of why the date scheme is much better than the
> old one - it clearly reflects the state of code inside the release.

What would that date actually reflect?  The last change from upstream,
the date of the matching upstream release, or the CentOS release date?
 I think what people want is to keep it closely tied to the upstream

   Les Mikesell
      lesmikesell at gmail.com