[CentOS-devel] Latest builds are now online 2014-06-25_build 4

Wed Jul 2 14:35:04 UTC 2014
Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org>

On 07/02/2014 03:30 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 4:52 AM, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org> wrote:
>> On 07/02/2014 10:38 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>>>> I am less opposed to these as they retain some semblance of a
>>>> correlation to upstream 7.0, although presumably any release would now
>>>> be .1407 rather than .1406 as we are now into July?
>>> no it wont, we use the tag that matches upstream's release stamp, so
>>> will stay 1406
>> This is a great example of why the date scheme is much better than the
>> old one - it clearly reflects the state of code inside the release.
> What would that date actually reflect?  The last change from upstream,
> the date of the matching upstream release, or the CentOS release date?

As i said, it would refleft ( as it does not ) the code age, and not a
centos release.

>  I think what people want is to keep it closely tied to the upstream
> identification.

yes, which is what this achieves.

Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc