[CentOS-devel] centos old repos c7.00.02 and c7.00.00

Sat Jul 5 11:46:41 UTC 2014
Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org>

On 07/05/2014 06:10 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
> On 06/21/2014 02:09 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> On 06/21/2014 06:49 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>> On 06/21/2014 06:39 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
>>>> On 06/21/2014 12:07 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>>>> On 06/21/2014 03:01 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
>>>>>> On 06/20/2014 11:18 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>>>>>> On 06/20/2014 03:34 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 06/20/2014 12:51 PM, Farkas Levente wrote:
>>>>>>>>> hi, is there any way to make the old c7.00.02 and
>>>>>>>>> c7.00.00 centos repos available? currently many i686
>>>>>>>>> packages missing from c7.00.03 and c7.00.04, but
>>>>>>>>> without these packages none of the i686 packages cab
>>>>>>>>> be build. regards.
>>>>>>>> we can put the c7.00.02 there ... that should have 
>>>>>>>> everything required to build everything in the current
>>>>>>>> c7 tree .. we'll get that pushed soon
>>>>>>> OK, Its there (c7.00.02)
>>>>>> may be c7.00.00 would be useful since eg gnupg2 has no
>>>>>> i686 package which required by rpm-build-libs so required
>>>>>> by everything...
>>>>> I am not building against c7.00.00 ... and everything is
>>>>> working fine for me now for i686.  The issue is that the more
>>>>> older RPMs we keep putting out there, the harder it is for
>>>>> yum to pick the right one.
>>>>> To yum, all RPMs of name-1.2.3-15.i686.rpm .. so if 3 or 4
>>>>> exist, it can pick either one to use.
>>>> can you tell me which repo contains gnupg2-x.i686.rpm? 
>>>> unfortunately none of them. and this rpm required by 
>>>> rpm-build-libs-4.11.1-16.el7.i686 which is required for all
>>>> build. so with the current c7.00.02, c7.00.03 and c7.00.04 it's
>>>> not possible to build any i686 rpm:-(
>>> I am moving one into c7.00.02 now, that should hopefully solve
>>> the issue.
>> OK, that is now in place, let me know if you have other issues
>> http://buildlogs.centos.org/c7.00.02/gnupg2/20140501124358/2.0.22-3.el7.i386/
> is
> there any reason not to publish c7.00.00?
> eg: pacemaker can only build with publican-3.1.5 which is neither in
> the publish repos nor in the final release:-(

Yes, there is a reason or it would be published.  I moved the publican
stuff over to c7.00.02, it should be there now, though a metadata
rebuild is in progress.

Let me know if you have any more issues.

> anyway will be any summary about the build problems? like the above
> one that pacemaker can't be build with on current os itself?

I did not keep a specific list, although all the builds and mock configs
are public and there are likely upstream and centos bug entries about
it.  If you want to develop a list, we can certainly have it on this
mailing list and put it on the wiki, either in the release notes or on a
build issues page.

Johnny Hughes

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20140705/2fe4b011/attachment-0007.sig>