On 07/05/2014 01:46 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 07/05/2014 06:10 AM, Farkas Levente wrote: >> On 06/21/2014 02:09 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> On 06/21/2014 06:49 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>>> On 06/21/2014 06:39 AM, Farkas Levente wrote: >>>>> On 06/21/2014 12:07 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>>>>> On 06/21/2014 03:01 AM, Farkas Levente wrote: >>>>>>> On 06/20/2014 11:18 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>>>>>>> On 06/20/2014 03:34 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 06/20/2014 12:51 PM, Farkas Levente wrote: >>>>>>>>>> hi, is there any way to make the old c7.00.02 >>>>>>>>>> and c7.00.00 centos repos available? currently >>>>>>>>>> many i686 packages missing from c7.00.03 and >>>>>>>>>> c7.00.04, but without these packages none of the >>>>>>>>>> i686 packages cab be build. regards. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> we can put the c7.00.02 there ... that should have >>>>>>>>> everything required to build everything in the >>>>>>>>> current c7 tree .. we'll get that pushed soon >>>>>>>> OK, Its there (c7.00.02) >>>>>>> may be c7.00.00 would be useful since eg gnupg2 has no >>>>>>> i686 package which required by rpm-build-libs so >>>>>>> required by everything... >>>>>>> >>>>>> I am not building against c7.00.00 ... and everything is >>>>>> working fine for me now for i686. The issue is that the >>>>>> more older RPMs we keep putting out there, the harder it >>>>>> is for yum to pick the right one. >>>>>> >>>>>> To yum, all RPMs of name-1.2.3-15.i686.rpm .. so if 3 or >>>>>> 4 exist, it can pick either one to use. >>>>> can you tell me which repo contains gnupg2-x.i686.rpm? >>>>> unfortunately none of them. and this rpm required by >>>>> rpm-build-libs-4.11.1-16.el7.i686 which is required for >>>>> all build. so with the current c7.00.02, c7.00.03 and >>>>> c7.00.04 it's not possible to build any i686 rpm:-( >>>>> >>>> I am moving one into c7.00.02 now, that should hopefully >>>> solve the issue. >>> OK, that is now in place, let me know if you have other issues >>> >>> http://buildlogs.centos.org/c7.00.02/gnupg2/20140501124358/2.0.22-3.el7.i386/ >> >>> is >> there any reason not to publish c7.00.00? eg: pacemaker can only >> build with publican-3.1.5 which is neither in the publish repos >> nor in the final release:-( > > Yes, there is a reason or it would be published. I moved the > publican stuff over to c7.00.02, it should be there now, though a > metadata rebuild is in progress. > > Let me know if you have any more issues. java6-1.6.0-* still missing. another nice thing would be know how are you able to build python? it's clear from this builds: http://buildlogs.centos.org/c7.00.04/python/ there was many unsuccessful build, but than somehow it was successful, but how and why? -- Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!"