[CentOS-devel] centos old repos c7.00.02 and c7.00.00

Sat Jul 5 18:42:55 UTC 2014
Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org>

On 07/05/2014 12:23 PM, Farkas Levente wrote:
> On 07/05/2014 01:46 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> On 07/05/2014 06:10 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
>>> On 06/21/2014 02:09 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>>> On 06/21/2014 06:49 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>>>> On 06/21/2014 06:39 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
>>>>>> On 06/21/2014 12:07 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>>>>>> On 06/21/2014 03:01 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 06/20/2014 11:18 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 06/20/2014 03:34 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 06/20/2014 12:51 PM, Farkas Levente wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> hi, is there any way to make the old c7.00.02
>>>>>>>>>>> and c7.00.00 centos repos available? currently
>>>>>>>>>>> many i686 packages missing from c7.00.03 and
>>>>>>>>>>> c7.00.04, but without these packages none of the
>>>>>>>>>>> i686 packages cab be build. regards.
>>>>>>>>>> we can put the c7.00.02 there ... that should have
>>>>>>>>>>  everything required to build everything in the
>>>>>>>>>> current c7 tree .. we'll get that pushed soon
>>>>>>>>> OK, Its there (c7.00.02)
>>>>>>>> may be c7.00.00 would be useful since eg gnupg2 has no 
>>>>>>>> i686 package which required by rpm-build-libs so
>>>>>>>> required by everything...
>>>>>>> I am not building against c7.00.00 ... and everything is 
>>>>>>> working fine for me now for i686.  The issue is that the
>>>>>>> more older RPMs we keep putting out there, the harder it
>>>>>>> is for yum to pick the right one.
>>>>>>> To yum, all RPMs of name-1.2.3-15.i686.rpm .. so if 3 or
>>>>>>> 4 exist, it can pick either one to use.
>>>>>> can you tell me which repo contains gnupg2-x.i686.rpm? 
>>>>>> unfortunately none of them. and this rpm required by 
>>>>>> rpm-build-libs-4.11.1-16.el7.i686 which is required for
>>>>>> all build. so with the current c7.00.02, c7.00.03 and
>>>>>> c7.00.04 it's not possible to build any i686 rpm:-(
>>>>> I am moving one into c7.00.02 now, that should hopefully
>>>>> solve the issue.
>>>> OK, that is now in place, let me know if you have other issues
>>>> http://buildlogs.centos.org/c7.00.02/gnupg2/20140501124358/2.0.22-3.el7.i386/
> is
>>> there any reason not to publish c7.00.00? eg: pacemaker can only
>>> build with publican-3.1.5 which is neither in the publish repos
>>> nor in the final release:-(
>> Yes, there is a reason or it would be published.  I moved the
>> publican stuff over to c7.00.02, it should be there now, though a
>> metadata rebuild is in progress.
>> Let me know if you have any more issues.
> java6-1.6.0-* still missing.

Is it required by something I built ... looking through some older stuff
I do not see a good i686 build of java-1.6.0.  It might be there
somewhere, but I don't see it now.  We are not releasing a i686 until
later and we have not begun concentration on a full i686 build yet.

However, if it is a requirement to build something that I have already
built, then I'll spend more time looking.

> another nice thing would be know how are you able to build python?
> it's clear from this builds:
> http://buildlogs.centos.org/c7.00.04/python/
> there was many unsuccessful build, but than somehow it was successful,
> but how and why?


There is a build.log, a root.log, a mock config and everything you could
need to know right there .. shows where the things were loaded from.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20140705/b3d3134a/attachment-0007.sig>