[CentOS-devel] CentOS 7 and release numbering

[Tim Bell]

A few quick thoughts....

1. Does the SIG need a naming convention also, e.g.

CentOS-7.1407-Cloud-140805

i.e. the cloud SIG based build done on 5th August 2014 based off the CentOS 7 tree in July 2014.

2. The minor release number is not in the naming convention. Is this a question of length ?

CentOS-7.0-1407

I am thinking as we get to beta releases of 7.1, having a mechanism to name the beta releases independently of the production ones would be useful.

Tim

> -----Original Message-----
> From: centos-devel-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-devel-
> bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Karanbir Singh
> Sent: 07 June 2014 02:44
> To: centos-devel at centos.org
> Subject: [CentOS-devel] CentOS 7 and release numbering
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> hi,
> 
> Taking on board the community and environment expansion that is taking place
> around the CentOS project, the CentOS Board has been considering how best to
> accomodate these efforts.
> 
> I'm attaching here a plan put forward by the board towards that aim.
> 
> Thoughts ? Comments ?
> 
> - - KB
> 
> - --
> Karanbir Singh, Project Lead, The CentOS Project
> +44-207-0999389 | http://www.centos.org/ | twitter.com/CentOS
> GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
> 
> iEYEARECAAYFAlOSYF4ACgkQMA29nj4Tz1usTwCgr9K0th6XcMzSmjGQvwnbeeiR
> KhsAn36gaRbCuGoGzqEa2TN+TDFEEZjR
> =GbVM
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----