[CentOS-devel] CentOS 7 and release numbering

[Carl Trieloff]

On 06/07/2014 06:56 AM, Tim Bell wrote:
> A few quick thoughts....
>
> 1. Does the SIG need a naming convention also, e.g.
>
> CentOS-7.1407-Cloud-140805
>
> i.e. the cloud SIG based build done on 5th August 2014 based off the CentOS 7 tree in July 2014.
>
> 2. The minor release number is not in the naming convention. Is this a question of length ?
>
> CentOS-7.0-1407
>
> I am thinking as we get to beta releases of 7.1, having a mechanism to name the beta releases independently of the production ones would be useful.
>
>


We have debated the SIG TAG, and then left if open for list debate as
there are a few options here.

Firstly, if a SIG can achieve everything it needs in terms of mounting
optional repo's and adding options to the installer non harming then
there is no need require a SIG tag. However if a SIG requires a release
that changes the kernel and wants to create an ISO for that then it
clearly requires the use of a SIG tag as we can't break core. The 3rd
case would be if a SIG release and does not affect the core ISO /
install, just in it's own repo, it may want to indicate to users it has
made a release.

We came up with a few ideas around these with various merits which I can
post a bit later to list. This aspect we should work through with the
SIGs on this list. We may want to try release a few SIGs before we fully
define the SIG TAG rules.

Carl.