On 06/18/2014 09:30 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 06/18/2014 03:09 PM, Jason Pyeron wrote: > >> How, if any, does this impact the "most proper" way of converting from CentOS to >> RHEL on a live system. >> > > how has this worked in the past? we dont ship rhn tools in CentOS-5/6 > either. > My opinion on this is that we should take them out of the distro and IF someone like Spacewalk needs them then they can push modified versions as part of a SIG. We could push a version that works with Spacewalk if we want .. but it might be better if they do it as then they can configure them the right way, etc. I mean, we CAN include them, but we haven't in the past, and people still use spacewalk. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20140618/d39905a7/attachment-0007.sig>