On 06/18/2014 11:17 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 06/18/2014 09:30 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote: >> On 06/18/2014 03:09 PM, Jason Pyeron wrote: >> >>> How, if any, does this impact the "most proper" way of converting from CentOS to >>> RHEL on a live system. >>> >> how has this worked in the past? we dont ship rhn tools in CentOS-5/6 >> either. >> > My opinion on this is that we should take them out of the distro and IF > someone like Spacewalk needs them then they can push modified versions > as part of a SIG. We could push a version that works with Spacewalk if > we want .. but it might be better if they do it as then they can > configure them the right way, etc. > > I mean, we CAN include them, but we haven't in the past, and people > still use spacewalk. > > Upstream spacewalk has: http://spacewalk.redhat.com/yum/2.1-client/RHEL/6/x86_64/ containing the necessary bits for spacewalk integration on 5 and 6. Pat -- Pat Riehecky Scientific Linux developer http://www.scientificlinux.org/