On 06/25/2014 05:39 PM, Morten Stevens wrote: > 2014-06-25 17:50 GMT+02:00 Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org>: > >> Note: this tree now has a centos-release that implements the scope of >> change we were talking about in the numbering thread. I went through >> quite a few permutations and what we have here seems like the best >> middle ground to be on. I am also going to try and circle back to some >> of the RH folks to make sure they are ok with how we message around >> where the CentOS Linux release is built from. > > This change is not the majority of the community. > > # rpm -q centos-release > centos-release-7-1406.el7.centos.0.4.x86_64 > > 7-1406 looks confusing... Is it possible to remove the YYMM section > from centos-release rpm? All other Red Hat projects like Fedora > doesn't use this strange release numbering. 1406 sounds like an Ubuntu > release... The actual rpm name isnt very different from what we have on CentOS-6, we need the last few digits for build/rebuild in testing work. but we could potentially drop those. > > Overall, it's a rebuilt of RHEL 7.0. Why not call it CentOS 7.0? And this message is quite clearly communicated in lsb_release -a; isnt it ? -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc