On 06/25/2014 12:25 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 06/25/2014 05:39 PM, Morten Stevens wrote: >> 2014-06-25 17:50 GMT+02:00 Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org>: >> >>> Note: this tree now has a centos-release that implements the scope of >>> change we were talking about in the numbering thread. I went through >>> quite a few permutations and what we have here seems like the best >>> middle ground to be on. I am also going to try and circle back to some >>> of the RH folks to make sure they are ok with how we message around >>> where the CentOS Linux release is built from. >> This change is not the majority of the community. >> >> # rpm -q centos-release >> centos-release-7-1406.el7.centos.0.4.x86_64 >> >> 7-1406 looks confusing... Is it possible to remove the YYMM section >> from centos-release rpm? All other Red Hat projects like Fedora >> doesn't use this strange release numbering. 1406 sounds like an Ubuntu >> release... > The actual rpm name isnt very different from what we have on CentOS-6, > we need the last few digits for build/rebuild in testing work. but we > could potentially drop those. > >> Overall, it's a rebuilt of RHEL 7.0. Why not call it CentOS 7.0? > And this message is quite clearly communicated in lsb_release -a; isnt it ? or from 'cat /etc/redhat-release' -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20140625/71017202/attachment-0007.sig>