Hi, On 03/19/2014 04:57 PM, Dan Porter wrote: > I like the name |server-minimal|, or even just |minimal| for the purpose > of what the current version is. > > Perhaps this super skinny version ought to be called.. |micro|? > ok, micro is interesting. > On 19 March 2014 16:41, Jeff Sheltren <jeff at tag1consulting.com > <mailto:jeff at tag1consulting.com>> wrote: > > Karanbir Singh wrote: > > > > the aim being to setup a base image, that is under 150mb to > download and > > deploy. > > > > > > I think there are (at least) two different types of "minimal" that could > (and should) be provided. > > 1) "working server minimal" which would have at least yum and sshd -- > this could be similar to what we do for minimal now, though I'm not > totally opposed to shrinking it down a bit more. Would the present minimal install be suiteable for this? we have an iso dedicated to the role ( and afaik, its the most downloaded iso and the most popular install mechanism on c6 ). > 2) "really really minimal -- and we mean minimal!" -- where the goal is > to strip out as much as possible, no docs, no yum, no ssshd, etc. yeah - but no sshd might be a challenge since then we pre-assume that console is the way to get in. -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc