On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 05:21:56PM +0000, Karanbir Singh wrote: > Hi, > > On 03/19/2014 04:57 PM, Dan Porter wrote: > > I like the name |server-minimal|, or even just |minimal| for the purpose > > of what the current version is. > > > > Perhaps this super skinny version ought to be called.. |micro|? > > > > ok, micro is interesting. > > > On 19 March 2014 16:41, Jeff Sheltren <jeff at tag1consulting.com > > <mailto:jeff at tag1consulting.com>> wrote: > > > > Karanbir Singh wrote: > > > > > > the aim being to setup a base image, that is under 150mb to > > download and > > > deploy. > > > > > > > > > > I think there are (at least) two different types of "minimal" that could > > (and should) be provided. > > > > 1) "working server minimal" which would have at least yum and sshd -- > > this could be similar to what we do for minimal now, though I'm not > > totally opposed to shrinking it down a bit more. > > Would the present minimal install be suiteable for this? we have an iso > dedicated to the role ( and afaik, its the most downloaded iso and the > most popular install mechanism on c6 ). I for one would like to see openssh-clients added, since it is missing scp :) -- Bryan G. Seitz