Hi On 05/23/2014 04:02 PM, Chris St. Pierre wrote: > If we're going to have a hackish approach regardless, is this something > we could shoehorn into the image build process? I don't know much about > the CentOS build infrastructure, but in Fedora we could do something like: We just had a brief chat about this, and it looks like the best way to handle it might be to build the patch into CentOS Plus, and then use that package, and only that package, from CentOS Plus at buildtime. Then leave enough .repo content in /etc/yum.repos.d/ that we have an update path for people into the future. I believe Jim is going to work on the kickstart to make this work, and Johnny is going to get the rpm into plus. Once those two things happen - I can get a testing image online, and if that works, we can update the index at docker.io - KB -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc