On 05/27/2014 12:01 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > Hi > > On 05/23/2014 04:02 PM, Chris St. Pierre wrote: >> If we're going to have a hackish approach regardless, is this something >> we could shoehorn into the image build process? I don't know much about >> the CentOS build infrastructure, but in Fedora we could do something like: > We just had a brief chat about this, and it looks like the best way to > handle it might be to build the patch into CentOS Plus, and then use > that package, and only that package, from CentOS Plus at buildtime. Then > leave enough .repo content in /etc/yum.repos.d/ that we have an update > path for people into the future. > > I believe Jim is going to work on the kickstart to make this work, and > Johnny is going to get the rpm into plus. Once those two things happen - > I can get a testing image online, and if that works, we can update the > index at docker.io > > - KB > libselinux-2.0.94-5.3.0.1.el6.centos.plus* is now in the centosplus repo .. and it should be replaced by newer updates to 6.6 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20140527/eeb67df3/attachment-0007.sig>