I've generated my own list of ordered sources. Following are the
techniques, scripts, and data. Comments or corrections on any of these
would be most appreciated.
Sources of Data
1) ftp.redhat.com
all *.src.rpm files under redhat/linux/enterprise/6*/en/os/SRPMS
2) vault.centos.org
all *.src.rpm files under 6.*/{os,updates,fasttrack}
If anyone feels I'm starting from the wrong data, please say so. I debated
about including the fasttrack dirs, but as this point I've convinced myself
that it is probably correct, or at worst harmless).
I wrote a script to do all the heavy lifting. For args it expects files
containing lists of paths to source rpms (there are too many srpms involved
to pass them directly on the command line). The script identifies srpms
with identical contents by comparing the list of files and their hashs (so
a centos rebuilt srpm with no changes is considered a duplicate of the rh
one even though some of the headers change (e.g. vendor, buildtime).
The script sorts first by package name, then by version-release *with dist
tag removed*, then by rh vs centos, then by full version-release. An srpm
is considered a centos rpm if either the vendor is centos, or a centos dist
tag appears in the release, otherwise it is considered an rh srpm.
I have posted the script and its current output here:
https://mikem.fedorapeople.org/centos_srpm_sort2.py
https://mikem.fedorapeople.org/centos_srpm_sort2.log
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote:
> On 10/30/2014 11:50 AM, Mike McLean wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org
> > <mailto:johnny at centos.org>> wrote:
> >
> > As was discussed before, CentOS-6 SRPMS are going to be imported into
> > git.centos.org <http://git.centos.org> as well and will be processed
> > like CentOS-7 ones are now.
> >
> > We want to bring everything in from 6.0 initial and through
> 6.4+updates
> > initially, then we will do 6.5+updates (as that is changing right
> now).
> >
> > So, I have created a 6.0 to 6.4 set of lists. These lists live at
> this
> > location:
> >
> > http://people.centos.org/hughesjr/EL6-Import/
> >
> > The two lists so far are:
> >
> > EL6-non-mod-SRPMS-sorted.txt
> > centos-6-srpms-modified.txt
> >
> > 1. The EL6-non-mod-SRPMS-sorted.txt is all SRPMS used in CentOS-6 in
> > their unmodified form. The order they appear in the file is the
> order
> > they will be imported into git. What is important for history is
> that
> > (for each NAME) they are imported in the correct order, so from 6.0
> > through 6.4+updates, the order of packages used in CentOS-6 for
> > 389-ds-base would be:
> >
> > 389-ds-base-1.2.8.2-1.el6.src.rpm
> > 389-ds-base-1.2.8.2-1.el6_1.3.src.rpm
> > 389-ds-base-1.2.9.14-1.el6.src.rpm
> > 389-ds-base-1.2.9.14-1.el6_2.2.src.rpm
> > 389-ds-base-1.2.10.2-15.el6.src.rpm
> > 389-ds-base-1.2.10.2-18.el6_3.src.rpm
> > 389-ds-base-1.2.10.2-20.el6_3.src.rpm
> > 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-11.el6.src.rpm
> > 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-12.el6_4.src.rpm
> > 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-14.el6_4.src.rpm
> > 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-20.el6_4.src.rpm
> > 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-22.el6_4.src.rpm
> >
> > All of these packages will come from ftp.redhat.com
> > <http://ftp.redhat.com> and be imported.
> >
> >
> > I'm running a test import of the nonmod ones and it appears a number in
> > the list have the wrong dist tag in the name.
> > For example, bnx2-2.2.1.32.269-1.el6.src.rpm should be
> > bnx2-2.2.1.32.269-1.el6_2.src.rpm (e.g. .el6_2 instead of .el6). Can you
> > confirm?
>
> Yes, those were wrong in centos .. for those, I think we have the centos
> name.
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS-devel mailing list
> CentOS-devel at centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20141113/83c8e85b/attachment-0007.html>