On 11/6/14, centos-devel-request at centos.org <centos-devel-request at centos.org> wrote: > Send CentOS-devel mailing list submissions to > centos-devel at centos.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > centos-devel-request at centos.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > centos-devel-owner at centos.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of CentOS-devel digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Secondary archs and how we might build them (Karanbir Singh) > 2. Re: Secondary archs and how we might build them (Sameer Kumar) > 3. Re: Secondary archs and how we might build them > (Gururaj S Alagwadi) > 4. Re: Secondary archs and how we might build them (Elias Persson) > 5. Re: Secondary archs and how we might build them (Jeffrey Scheel) > 6. Re: Secondary archs and how we might build them (Karanbir Singh) > 7. Re: Secondary archs and how we might build them (Karanbir Singh) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 08:31:32 +0000 > From: Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org> > To: centos-devel at centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] Secondary archs and how we might build > them > Message-ID: <5459E064.8090608 at karan.org> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > On 05/11/14 03:55, Sameer Kumar wrote: >> >> On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 1:16 AM, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org >> <mailto:mail-lists at karan.org>> wrote: >> >> On 10/21/2014 06:06 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: >> > There has been reasonable levels of interest in the various >> secondary >> > arch's - i386 / powerpc / arm32 / arm64; but the Core SIG team is >> just >> > too busy to actively participate and deliver on these. >> >> http://www.needtomeet.com/meeting?id=v8xfphi1E please go ahead and >> fill >> it out and lets make something happen next week. >> >> >> ?I am not sure why but I am not able to save my response. But Friday >> afternoon GMT works for me. >> >> Any heads up on what architectures we are planning to discuss? >> > > I am going to do the demo bits on i686, but the process is overall arch > agnostic; the only special case is arm32 where the delivery path is > largely via rootfs - but were a fair distance from that. > > > -- > Karanbir Singh > +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh > GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 23:33:38 +0800 > From: Sameer Kumar <sameer.kumar at ashnik.com> > To: "The CentOS developers mailing list." <centos-devel at centos.org> > Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] Secondary archs and how we might build > them > Message-ID: > <CADp-Sm6DFsgkAYokny1iykuizMik80sY4x+ySg7pKMReueYKtA at mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > On 5 Nov 2014 18:36, "Jeffrey Scheel" <scheel at us.ibm.com> wrote: >> >> On 10/21/2014 06:06 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: >> > There has been reasonable levels of interest in the various secondary >> > arch's - i386 / powerpc / arm32 / arm64; but the Core SIG team is just >> > too busy to actively participate and deliver on these. >> Karanbir, I just requested attendance to the meeting. Please include me > and >> the others on the needtomeet request. Thx, >> -Jeff >> >> Jeffrey J. Scheel > > Please include me in the invite for next call. > >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> CentOS-devel mailing list >> CentOS-devel at centos.org >> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel >> > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20141105/28a77485/attachment-0001.html> > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 21:33:26 +0530 > From: Gururaj S Alagwadi <agururaj at in.ibm.com> > To: "The CentOS developers mailing list." <centos-devel at centos.org> > Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] Secondary archs and how we might build > them > Message-ID: > <OFE3B9CBAA.BF7E8BAF-ON65257D87.00585E03-65257D87.0058939D at in.ibm.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Hello Karanbir, > > Please include me on your next invite. > > Regards, > Guru > > ______________________________________________ > Gururaj Alagwadi > > > > From: Sameer Kumar <sameer.kumar at ashnik.com> > To: "The CentOS developers mailing list." <centos-devel at centos.org> > Date: 11/05/2014 08:59 PM > Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] Secondary archs and how we might build them > Sent by: centos-devel-bounces at centos.org > > > > > > > On 5 Nov 2014 18:36, "Jeffrey Scheel" <scheel at us.ibm.com> wrote: >> >> On 10/21/2014 06:06 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: >> > There has been reasonable levels of interest in the various secondary >> > arch's - i386 / powerpc / arm32 / arm64; but the Core SIG team is just >> > too busy to actively participate and deliver on these. >> Karanbir, I just requested attendance to the meeting.? Please include me > and >> the others on the needtomeet request.? Thx, >> -Jeff >> >> Jeffrey J. Scheel > > > Please include me in the invite for next call. > > >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> CentOS-devel mailing list >> CentOS-devel at centos.org >> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel >>_______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2014 12:21:03 +0100 > From: Elias Persson <delreich at takeit.se> > To: "The CentOS developers mailing list." <centos-devel at centos.org> > Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] Secondary archs and how we might build > them > Message-ID: <545B599F.3010109 at takeit.se> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 2014-10-31 18:16, Karanbir Singh wrote: >> On 10/21/2014 06:06 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: >>> There has been reasonable levels of interest in the various >>> secondary arch's - i386 / powerpc / arm32 / arm64; but the Core >>> SIG team is just too busy to actively participate and deliver on >>> these. >> >> http://www.needtomeet.com/meeting?id=v8xfphi1E please go ahead and >> fill it out and lets make something happen next week. >> > > I think you shared the wrong URI there... That one gets me admin rights. > Should probably have been http://www.needtomeet.com/meeting?id=602tt0s6V > (found by clicking "Attendee link"). > > - -- > AF24 6DE9 D1DF DFB8 3A74 A7AC F457 B7A3 5DF1 4240 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2 > > iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUW1mfAAoJEPRXt6Nd8UJAuN0P/2IOongVIGbUWNcQAosBMtWv > aB5u8KO84TOadRPcjZY5JFDLEJQk/oqEzwo4Qix9PtAT9j4iicfo+EUK+6vdfDRv > rqEqK8bP4oFhXbJqcM0sehPUKOI4O5lTfJ+3uSkO3mD3M1PognbKOY5QX4TQAt6n > KPL0TTkniS5J0oRH5O6msuiscCy00/MAu1s7imczKbwqCCmgKhvfov8EQb8DyGNy > /wu/Qi/kCcuARQey843rlMdCc2wYjo6ZvJU73sn5pUBid3ZfdLePwZJZb3wXXdek > i5uPCCbRsbuYTy1bwB3ibz6p9MPg7fq5EYIa7ci5vWS5fjnRauP+lhVCOcE0nTxN > wCDMbtB+N8kMI+yW11WUOZ3b+DMu/DrVwEF384IMtJrBTqnFrobaf6W85vqxaagc > 0G0EZeoNeJylWYAWMkUFZQ/Vqj2+BG/4qGloWF/ChMSTueOHCRUW6t9XyeNKirNV > bt974wsSWzTM25nbkseSskLNj1n7pa+wETyUhA6B8Om5C1uT/MABTxLcz4Doj5Xq > IW7V+1GQN/bPtjonrvWscEo2u6/oWV/sneemketoJY/HN4D+AQQ0MUVhBB8X0vtB > IOKAIl/i7e7hJwNd34+Pb8v7YIaG1KWQjIVTmYlNbSzKPaEgCxMalciWr2W33Zz/ > NIrS457rBG+dJ9309CQz > =LKaT > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2014 05:25:53 -0600 > From: Jeffrey Scheel <scheel at us.ibm.com> > To: "The CentOS developers mailing list." <centos-devel at centos.org> > Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] Secondary archs and how we might build > them > Message-ID: > <OFFF9E4E05.EAAA1DB3-ON86257D88.003EA106-86257D88.003ECB4F at us.ibm.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > Elias Persson <delreich at takeit.se> wrote on 11/06/2014 05:21:03: >> I think you shared the wrong URI there... That one gets me admin rights. >> Should probably have been http://www.needtomeet.com/meeting?id=602tt0s6V >> (found by clicking "Attendee link"). > Cool, thanks! > > Have we picked a time this week or are we going to defer to next? > -Jeff > > Jeffrey J. Scheel > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20141106/2a41e9f0/attachment-0001.html> > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 6 > Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2014 11:29:27 +0000 > From: Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org> > To: centos-devel at centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] Secondary archs and how we might build > them > Message-ID: <545B5B97.8010701 at karan.org> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 > > On 11/06/2014 11:21 AM, Elias Persson wrote: >> On 2014-10-31 18:16, Karanbir Singh wrote: >>> On 10/21/2014 06:06 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: >>>> There has been reasonable levels of interest in the various >>>> secondary arch's - i386 / powerpc / arm32 / arm64; but the Core >>>> SIG team is just too busy to actively participate and deliver on >>>> these. >> >>> http://www.needtomeet.com/meeting?id=v8xfphi1E please go ahead and >>> fill it out and lets make something happen next week. >> >> >> I think you shared the wrong URI there... That one gets me admin rights. >> Should probably have been http://www.needtomeet.com/meeting?id=602tt0s6V >> (found by clicking "Attendee link"). > > i am easy, i think we are all trustable folks here :) plus there is an > email generated everytime someone fills things in. > > -- > Karanbir Singh > +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh > GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 7 > Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2014 11:30:51 +0000 > From: Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org> > To: centos-devel at centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] Secondary archs and how we might build > them > Message-ID: <545B5BEB.7010706 at karan.org> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 > > On 11/06/2014 11:25 AM, Jeffrey Scheel wrote: >> Elias Persson <delreich at takeit.se> wrote on 11/06/2014 05:21:03: >>> I think you shared the wrong URI there... That one gets me admin rights. >>> Should probably have been http://www.needtomeet.com/meeting?id=602tt0s6V >>> (found by clicking "Attendee link"). >> Cool, thanks! >> >> Have we picked a time this week or are we going to defer to next? >> -Jeff >> > > I think Thu 11am UTC looks to be the best spot for people, lets try and > hit that for the 13th. I'll setup the hangout and send out urls shortly. > We are limited to 12 people on the session at one time and i think we > have 11 listed up ( hopefully, i can be the 12th! ). > > we can likely repeat the session in 2 weeks time, on the 27th. > > - KB > > > -- > Karanbir Singh > +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh > GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel > > > End of CentOS-devel Digest, Vol 117, Issue 5 > ******************************************** > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: BulkUploadCsvTemplate.csv Type: text/csv Size: 234 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20141115/79459932/attachment-0007.csv>