On 11/15/14, Alemesegd GIDEY <alexyigidey.ag at gmail.com> wrote: > On 11/6/14, centos-devel-request at centos.org > <centos-devel-request at centos.org> wrote: >> Send CentOS-devel mailing list submissions to >> centos-devel at centos.org >> >> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel >> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >> centos-devel-request at centos.org >> >> You can reach the person managing the list at >> centos-devel-owner at centos.org >> >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >> than "Re: Contents of CentOS-devel digest..." >> >> >> Today's Topics: >> >> 1. Re: Secondary archs and how we might build them (Karanbir Singh) >> 2. Re: Secondary archs and how we might build them (Sameer Kumar) >> 3. Re: Secondary archs and how we might build them >> (Gururaj S Alagwadi) >> 4. Re: Secondary archs and how we might build them (Elias Persson) >> 5. Re: Secondary archs and how we might build them (Jeffrey Scheel) >> 6. Re: Secondary archs and how we might build them (Karanbir Singh) >> 7. Re: Secondary archs and how we might build them (Karanbir Singh) >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Message: 1 >> Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 08:31:32 +0000 >> From: Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org> >> To: centos-devel at centos.org >> Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] Secondary archs and how we might build >> them >> Message-ID: <5459E064.8090608 at karan.org> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 >> >> On 05/11/14 03:55, Sameer Kumar wrote: >>> >>> On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 1:16 AM, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org >>> <mailto:mail-lists at karan.org>> wrote: >>> >>> On 10/21/2014 06:06 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: >>> > There has been reasonable levels of interest in the various >>> secondary >>> > arch's - i386 / powerpc / arm32 / arm64; but the Core SIG team is >>> just >>> > too busy to actively participate and deliver on these. >>> >>> http://www.needtomeet.com/meeting?id=v8xfphi1E please go ahead and >>> fill >>> it out and lets make something happen next week. >>> >>> >>> ?I am not sure why but I am not able to save my response. But Friday >>> afternoon GMT works for me. >>> >>> Any heads up on what architectures we are planning to discuss? >>> >> >> I am going to do the demo bits on i686, but the process is overall arch >> agnostic; the only special case is arm32 where the delivery path is >> largely via rootfs - but were a fair distance from that. >> >> >> -- >> Karanbir Singh >> +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh >> GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 2 >> Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 23:33:38 +0800 >> From: Sameer Kumar <sameer.kumar at ashnik.com> >> To: "The CentOS developers mailing list." <centos-devel at centos.org> >> Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] Secondary archs and how we might build >> them >> Message-ID: >> <CADp-Sm6DFsgkAYokny1iykuizMik80sY4x+ySg7pKMReueYKtA at mail.gmail.com> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >> >> On 5 Nov 2014 18:36, "Jeffrey Scheel" <scheel at us.ibm.com> wrote: >>> >>> On 10/21/2014 06:06 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: >>> > There has been reasonable levels of interest in the various secondary >>> > arch's - i386 / powerpc / arm32 / arm64; but the Core SIG team is just >>> > too busy to actively participate and deliver on these. >>> Karanbir, I just requested attendance to the meeting. Please include me >> and >>> the others on the needtomeet request. Thx, >>> -Jeff >>> >>> Jeffrey J. Scheel >> >> Please include me in the invite for next call. >> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> CentOS-devel mailing list >>> CentOS-devel at centos.org >>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel >>> >> -------------- next part -------------- >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >> URL: >> <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20141105/28a77485/attachment-0001.html> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 3 >> Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 21:33:26 +0530 >> From: Gururaj S Alagwadi <agururaj at in.ibm.com> >> To: "The CentOS developers mailing list." <centos-devel at centos.org> >> Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] Secondary archs and how we might build >> them >> Message-ID: >> <OFE3B9CBAA.BF7E8BAF-ON65257D87.00585E03-65257D87.0058939D at in.ibm.com> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >> >> Hello Karanbir, >> >> Please include me on your next invite. >> >> Regards, >> Guru >> >> ______________________________________________ >> Gururaj Alagwadi >> >> >> >> From: Sameer Kumar <sameer.kumar at ashnik.com> >> To: "The CentOS developers mailing list." <centos-devel at centos.org> >> Date: 11/05/2014 08:59 PM >> Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] Secondary archs and how we might build them >> Sent by: centos-devel-bounces at centos.org >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 5 Nov 2014 18:36, "Jeffrey Scheel" <scheel at us.ibm.com> wrote: >>> >>> On 10/21/2014 06:06 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: >>> > There has been reasonable levels of interest in the various secondary >>> > arch's - i386 / powerpc / arm32 / arm64; but the Core SIG team is just >>> > too busy to actively participate and deliver on these. >>> Karanbir, I just requested attendance to the meeting.? Please include me >> and >>> the others on the needtomeet request.? Thx, >>> -Jeff >>> >>> Jeffrey J. Scheel >> >> >> Please include me in the invite for next call. >> >> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> CentOS-devel mailing list >>> CentOS-devel at centos.org >>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel >>>_______________________________________________ >> CentOS-devel mailing list >> CentOS-devel at centos.org >> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 4 >> Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2014 12:21:03 +0100 >> From: Elias Persson <delreich at takeit.se> >> To: "The CentOS developers mailing list." <centos-devel at centos.org> >> Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] Secondary archs and how we might build >> them >> Message-ID: <545B599F.3010109 at takeit.se> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 >> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 2014-10-31 18:16, Karanbir Singh wrote: >>> On 10/21/2014 06:06 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: >>>> There has been reasonable levels of interest in the various >>>> secondary arch's - i386 / powerpc / arm32 / arm64; but the Core >>>> SIG team is just too busy to actively participate and deliver on >>>> these. >>> >>> http://www.needtomeet.com/meeting?id=v8xfphi1E please go ahead and >>> fill it out and lets make something happen next week. >>> >> >> I think you shared the wrong URI there... That one gets me admin rights. >> Should probably have been http://www.needtomeet.com/meeting?id=602tt0s6V >> (found by clicking "Attendee link"). >> >> - -- >> AF24 6DE9 D1DF DFB8 3A74 A7AC F457 B7A3 5DF1 4240 >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >> Version: GnuPG v2 >> >> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUW1mfAAoJEPRXt6Nd8UJAuN0P/2IOongVIGbUWNcQAosBMtWv >> aB5u8KO84TOadRPcjZY5JFDLEJQk/oqEzwo4Qix9PtAT9j4iicfo+EUK+6vdfDRv >> rqEqK8bP4oFhXbJqcM0sehPUKOI4O5lTfJ+3uSkO3mD3M1PognbKOY5QX4TQAt6n >> KPL0TTkniS5J0oRH5O6msuiscCy00/MAu1s7imczKbwqCCmgKhvfov8EQb8DyGNy >> /wu/Qi/kCcuARQey843rlMdCc2wYjo6ZvJU73sn5pUBid3ZfdLePwZJZb3wXXdek >> i5uPCCbRsbuYTy1bwB3ibz6p9MPg7fq5EYIa7ci5vWS5fjnRauP+lhVCOcE0nTxN >> wCDMbtB+N8kMI+yW11WUOZ3b+DMu/DrVwEF384IMtJrBTqnFrobaf6W85vqxaagc >> 0G0EZeoNeJylWYAWMkUFZQ/Vqj2+BG/4qGloWF/ChMSTueOHCRUW6t9XyeNKirNV >> bt974wsSWzTM25nbkseSskLNj1n7pa+wETyUhA6B8Om5C1uT/MABTxLcz4Doj5Xq >> IW7V+1GQN/bPtjonrvWscEo2u6/oWV/sneemketoJY/HN4D+AQQ0MUVhBB8X0vtB >> IOKAIl/i7e7hJwNd34+Pb8v7YIaG1KWQjIVTmYlNbSzKPaEgCxMalciWr2W33Zz/ >> NIrS457rBG+dJ9309CQz >> =LKaT >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 5 >> Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2014 05:25:53 -0600 >> From: Jeffrey Scheel <scheel at us.ibm.com> >> To: "The CentOS developers mailing list." <centos-devel at centos.org> >> Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] Secondary archs and how we might build >> them >> Message-ID: >> <OFFF9E4E05.EAAA1DB3-ON86257D88.003EA106-86257D88.003ECB4F at us.ibm.com> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >> >> Elias Persson <delreich at takeit.se> wrote on 11/06/2014 05:21:03: >>> I think you shared the wrong URI there... That one gets me admin rights. >>> Should probably have been http://www.needtomeet.com/meeting?id=602tt0s6V >>> (found by clicking "Attendee link"). >> Cool, thanks! >> >> Have we picked a time this week or are we going to defer to next? >> -Jeff >> >> Jeffrey J. Scheel >> -------------- next part -------------- >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >> URL: >> <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20141106/2a41e9f0/attachment-0001.html> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 6 >> Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2014 11:29:27 +0000 >> From: Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org> >> To: centos-devel at centos.org >> Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] Secondary archs and how we might build >> them >> Message-ID: <545B5B97.8010701 at karan.org> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 >> >> On 11/06/2014 11:21 AM, Elias Persson wrote: >>> On 2014-10-31 18:16, Karanbir Singh wrote: >>>> On 10/21/2014 06:06 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: >>>>> There has been reasonable levels of interest in the various >>>>> secondary arch's - i386 / powerpc / arm32 / arm64; but the Core >>>>> SIG team is just too busy to actively participate and deliver on >>>>> these. >>> >>>> http://www.needtomeet.com/meeting?id=v8xfphi1E please go ahead and >>>> fill it out and lets make something happen next week. >>> >>> >>> I think you shared the wrong URI there... That one gets me admin rights. >>> Should probably have been http://www.needtomeet.com/meeting?id=602tt0s6V >>> (found by clicking "Attendee link"). >> >> i am easy, i think we are all trustable folks here :) plus there is an >> email generated everytime someone fills things in. >> >> -- >> Karanbir Singh >> +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh >> GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 7 >> Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2014 11:30:51 +0000 >> From: Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org> >> To: centos-devel at centos.org >> Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] Secondary archs and how we might build >> them >> Message-ID: <545B5BEB.7010706 at karan.org> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 >> >> On 11/06/2014 11:25 AM, Jeffrey Scheel wrote: >>> Elias Persson <delreich at takeit.se> wrote on 11/06/2014 05:21:03: >>>> I think you shared the wrong URI there... That one gets me admin >>>> rights. >>>> Should probably have been >>>> http://www.needtomeet.com/meeting?id=602tt0s6V >>>> (found by clicking "Attendee link"). >>> Cool, thanks! >>> >>> Have we picked a time this week or are we going to defer to next? >>> -Jeff >>> >> >> I think Thu 11am UTC looks to be the best spot for people, lets try and >> hit that for the 13th. I'll setup the hangout and send out urls shortly. >> We are limited to 12 people on the session at one time and i think we >> have 11 listed up ( hopefully, i can be the 12th! ). >> >> we can likely repeat the session in 2 weeks time, on the 27th. >> >> - KB >> >> >> -- >> Karanbir Singh >> +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh >> GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> CentOS-devel mailing list >> CentOS-devel at centos.org >> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel >> >> >> End of CentOS-devel Digest, Vol 117, Issue 5 >> ******************************************** >> >