On 10/31/2014 12:45 PM, Jim Perrin wrote: > > On 10/31/2014 12:40 PM, Pat Riehecky wrote: >> On 10/31/2014 12:03 PM, Jim Perrin wrote: >>> For those of you who have been asking about software collections... >>> >>> We've been working to make it more developer/contributor friendly in >>> true upstream fashion (and also so that we can provide proper builds). >>> >>> Feel free to observe or participate in the discussion. >>> https://www.redhat.com/archives/sclorg/2014-October/msg00007.html >>> >>> >>> >> Has there been any discussion as to how the branches within git will be >> named? > > That discussion has been started, but I don't believe it's been resolved > yet. Please feel free to participate/contribute. I'd imagine this > discussion will bleed across both lists, but I'd prefer to keep it on > the sclo list for now to help them see the community interest and > involvement. > Are there links to the archives of this discussion? Pat -- Pat Riehecky Scientific Linux developer http://www.scientificlinux.org/