On 10/31/2014 01:11 PM, Pat Riehecky wrote: > On 10/31/2014 12:45 PM, Jim Perrin wrote: >> >> On 10/31/2014 12:40 PM, Pat Riehecky wrote: >>> On 10/31/2014 12:03 PM, Jim Perrin wrote: >>>> For those of you who have been asking about software collections... >>>> >>>> We've been working to make it more developer/contributor friendly in >>>> true upstream fashion (and also so that we can provide proper builds). >>>> >>>> Feel free to observe or participate in the discussion. >>>> https://www.redhat.com/archives/sclorg/2014-October/msg00007.html >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> Has there been any discussion as to how the branches within git will be >>> named? >> >> That discussion has been started, but I don't believe it's been resolved >> yet. Please feel free to participate/contribute. I'd imagine this >> discussion will bleed across both lists, but I'd prefer to keep it on >> the sclo list for now to help them see the community interest and >> involvement. >> > Are there links to the archives of this discussion? I believe it was a face to face discussion, so not really. -- Jim Perrin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77