On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 6:25 AM, Jim Perrin <jperrin at centos.org> wrote: > > > On 09/02/2014 08:16 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > > hi > > > > now that EPEL has moved out of beta, what are the next steps needed to > > get epel-release included in CentOS-Extras. > > > > - KB > > > > > Re-signing the package with the centos key, and then adding it to the > repo. I don't see a need to do anything else. > > I think it's also worth considering if you want %config or %config(noreplace) for the .repo file in the package. We touched on this briefly in the EPEL meeting and Ansii opened a bug to track it: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135576 FWIW, epel-release-6 is %config(noreplace) on the repo file -- meaning it won't overwrite user-modified repo files. It might be worthwhile to have %config for the initial release of epel-release-7 (specifically to ensure that "gpgcheck=1" gets added), but after that I'd rather see it as "noreplace". I'll comment on the bug to see if we can get that sorted out. -Jeff -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20140902/23f098e6/attachment-0007.html>