On 09/02/2014 03:01 PM, Jeff Sheltren wrote: > On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 6:25 AM, Jim Perrin <jperrin at centos.org > <mailto:jperrin at centos.org>> wrote: > > > > On 09/02/2014 08:16 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > > hi > > > > now that EPEL has moved out of beta, what are the next steps needed to > > get epel-release included in CentOS-Extras. > > > > - KB > > > > > Re-signing the package with the centos key, and then adding it to the > repo. I don't see a need to do anything else. > > > I think it's also worth considering if you want %config or > %config(noreplace) for the .repo file in the package. We touched on > this briefly in the EPEL meeting and Ansii opened a bug to track it: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135576 > > FWIW, epel-release-6 is %config(noreplace) on the repo file -- meaning > it won't overwrite user-modified repo files. It might be worthwhile to > have %config for the initial release of epel-release-7 (specifically to > ensure that "gpgcheck=1" gets added), but after that I'd rather see it > as "noreplace". I'll comment on the bug to see if we can get that > sorted out. that would be a good thing to get in - i think the config files should survive a rpm update for site customisations. -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc