On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org> wrote: > > > > > FWIW, epel-release-6 is %config(noreplace) on the repo file -- meaning > > it won't overwrite user-modified repo files. It might be worthwhile to > > have %config for the initial release of epel-release-7 (specifically to > > ensure that "gpgcheck=1" gets added), but after that I'd rather see it > > as "noreplace". I'll comment on the bug to see if we can get that > > sorted out. > > that would be a good thing to get in - i think the config files should > survive a rpm update for site customisations. > I spoke with Jim about this on IRC and he and I are in agreement that it's best to sort it out within EPEL instead of having CentOS make any changes to the package. -Jeff -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20140902/86a28d44/attachment-0007.html>