On Tue, 2 Sep 2014 09:10:20 -0700 Jeff Sheltren <jeff at tag1consulting.com> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org> > wrote: > > > > > > > > FWIW, epel-release-6 is %config(noreplace) on the repo file -- > > > meaning it won't overwrite user-modified repo files. It might be > > > worthwhile to have %config for the initial release of > > > epel-release-7 (specifically to ensure that "gpgcheck=1" gets > > > added), but after that I'd rather see it as "noreplace". I'll > > > comment on the bug to see if we can get that sorted out. > > > > that would be a good thing to get in - i think the config files > > should survive a rpm update for site customisations. > > > > > I spoke with Jim about this on IRC and he and I are in agreement that > it's best to sort it out within EPEL instead of having CentOS make > any changes to the package. I just submitted an epel-release update. Testing and karma welcome. kevin -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20140902/208d1d02/attachment-0007.sig>