Kevin Fenzi wrote: > EPEL is 'best effort'. ... Correct. Some things will always be delayed or are actually never done. That's why I have configured priorities also for epel and suggested to do something like this for the centos copy. > * Folks actually filing bugs when they see overlapping packages so we > can remove them from epel (instead of posting about them where > maintainers are unlikely to see them and retire their epel packages). epel 5 has about 100 and epel 6 has about 75 packages filtered out with respect to base by priorities. With this in mind I wasn't expecting anything different from epel 7. So: please forgive me for not having filed these and the 175 ones before. -Michael