On Tue, 02 Sep 2014 20:10:05 +0200 Michael Lampe <mlampe0 at googlemail.com> wrote: > Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > EPEL is 'best effort'. ... > > Correct. Some things will always be delayed or are actually never > done. That's why I have configured priorities also for epel and > suggested to do something like this for the centos copy. > > > * Folks actually filing bugs when they see overlapping packages so > > we can remove them from epel (instead of posting about them where > > maintainers are unlikely to see them and retire their epel > > packages). > > epel 5 has about 100 and epel 6 has about 75 packages filtered out > with respect to base by priorities. With this in mind I wasn't > expecting anything different from epel 7. So: please forgive me for > not having filed these and the 175 ones before. it's actually also not that simple. A number of these are added to epel because rhel doesn't ship them on all arches. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL:Packaging#Limited_Arch_Packages So, all those need filtering out first. kevin -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20140902/be9738a2/attachment-0007.sig>