-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Hi, as an (most times) just end user of EL6/7 I'd like to say that I would prefer bugzilla.redhat.com for centos bugs as well. It makes shifting bugs between RHEL and CentOS very much simpler. The reason many bugs get reported first vs CentOS ist people do not really know the relationship between RHEL and CentOS. And the people who know the relationship have often no license to test if it's a CentOS or RHEL Bug (you would need a RHEL license to try to reproduce). When you have some experience you can of course tell with a high probability if it's CentOS or upstream related. TBH: Most (upstream)bugs tend to get closed anyway if someone finds out your not using RHEL. (This get's masked via sentences like "Please contact your support channel if you want to raise the priority of this problem") I wish RedHat would improve this behaviour, but you can not really argue if you get it for free. Back to the Bugzilla Question: I really think bugzilla has way better features and usability than mantis, but that's just me, and of course you have the ability to shift a bug to epel/fedora/rhel if it turns out you reported it against the wrong product. I think this might be increasingly important when you look at all the sig products which incorporate many projects already using bugzilla.redhat.com like ovirt, glusterfs and so on. kind regards Sven -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQGcBAEBCAAGBQJVLpWSAAoJEAq0kGAWDrql1HsMAKrPppy6uGcKbYezs1aZaLrt 6Ry8Q+OL+w/HGTaFN6fkuUJCyndxLH7dMgcRapGOu9Dnm78l1oKP/mkEl1FYiCe7 4WFQdYVDBeGPdnkw0qPRAywBwlq+maS2EtbK8iOq0nmcXFKnCuETzVe3oW59xHXQ vagHmp28rKsSgSB1IGgkmiigL0hWp34M9g/wDW4qnkf72tubB1dqYA5vJwMKODfi xQS2L/4Qg72W96sJXyjMU3i0XJlPgSeXVlwHu7msslTHD08iACH32Pc00WfXQrNg Fnf3UgdNdFZXocpG276VP/6dRKQ3zPAw1TZbCQE5DiYaTEI+FJKFln9I7hrj0j01 wUvS8OIKKrBlaPsTQExhxmHpY5akmdBrRKdxHHf5by5MN82w9uO3WMk0GKm2Xt+I WoIMdrfL3Qm/h2BtBbn9EK0d21aGZDmIww0Or91LPGBTt2tluOfr2HSgPc0cli7u xPgO7G4q3ddLP89MZ/LBg7R/NhAxiTiBwuzfv4hZ3A== =Jhsb -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----