On 04/21/2015 12:05 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > Which is why I thought we want RH type behavior (ie patches) on both our > fast moving and RHEL Atomic Host downstream branches for C7. We need > stuff that works correctly with SELINUX and systemd on CentOS-7. So, > IMHO, we want newer docker and RH patches. I certainly do - it doesn't make sense to me to have a faster moving Atomic missing the RHT patches and then put them into the rebuild. Let's be consistent as much as possible. Now, what the virt-SIG does is really up to them, maybe they intend to always ship vanilla upstream -- which is fine, but IMO it would make more sense to have a consistent story as much as possible. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier | Principal Cloud & Storage Analyst jzb at redhat.com | http://community.redhat.com/ Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 473 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20150427/437acf60/attachment-0008.sig>