----- Original Message ----- > From: "Lokesh Mandvekar" <lsm5 at fedoraproject.org> > To: "The CentOS developers mailing list." <centos-devel at centos.org> > Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2015 6:37:58 AM > Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] RH patches v/s vanilla docker in CentOS > > On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 07:16:30PM -0400, Jason Brooks wrote: > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Jason Brooks" <jbrooks at redhat.com> > > > To: "The CentOS developers mailing list." <centos-devel at centos.org> > > > Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 4:04:52 PM > > > Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] RH patches v/s vanilla docker in CentOS > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: "Lokesh Mandvekar" <lsm5 at fedoraproject.org> > > > > To: "The CentOS developers mailing list." <centos-devel at centos.org> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 9:07:12 AM > > > > Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] RH patches v/s vanilla docker in CentOS > > > > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > Given the conflicting requirements, would it make sense to have > > > > appropriate > > > > tags such that, a particular 'docker' (something with RH patches) build > > > > only > > > > makes it to atomic, while another 'docker' build makes it to > > > > virt7-release > > > > (only upstream docker sources) > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > I think it makes sense for everything atomic needs to live in atomic7, > > > and if atomic wants the same version as virt has, great, if not, atomic > > > could have its own. > > > > I just tried a tree compose w/ docker-master, but it Provides > > docker-io, not docker, so yum's trying to pull in plain "docker" > > as well, which conflicts... > > Ah ok, I can update it to 'Provides: docker' as well. But would that help > solve > the conflict or would it still get confused between 'docker' and > 'docker-master'. Maybe, docker-master deserves to be in a separate tag, > virt7-nightly perhaps?? It looks like kubernetes depends on docker or docker-io, so no problem there. In my compose, it's the atomic pkg that's calling for docker. Maybe the atomic pkg is what needs changing. Jason > > > > > > > > > Jason > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > CentOS-devel mailing list > > CentOS-devel at centos.org > > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel > > -- > Lokesh > Freenode, OFTC: lsm5 > GPG: 0xC7C3A0DD > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel >