On 10/12/15 07:54, Manuel Wolfshant wrote: > You are perfectly right here on all points. Unfortunately RH , short > of providing access to beta to the customers, never announces in > advance what packages will overlap with EPEL After speaking with someone from RH, it turns out (thankfully) that RH does have a sensible policy here. The RHEL maintainer *must* contact the EPEL maintainer during the process of introducing a package to RHEL. So either the RHEL libunwind maintainer didn't communicate as per the policy, or he did and the EPEL libunwind maintainer didn't do the right thing. (I haven't yet figured out which one.) Kind regards, Jamie