On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 8:34 AM, Jamie Nguyen <j at jamielinux.com> wrote: > On 10/12/15 07:54, Manuel Wolfshant wrote: >> You are perfectly right here on all points. Unfortunately RH , short >> of providing access to beta to the customers, never announces in >> advance what packages will overlap with EPEL > > After speaking with someone from RH, it turns out (thankfully) that RH > does have a sensible policy here. The RHEL maintainer *must* contact the > EPEL maintainer during the process of introducing a package to RHEL. > > So either the RHEL libunwind maintainer didn't communicate as per the > policy, or he did and the EPEL libunwind maintainer didn't do the right > thing. (I haven't yet figured out which one.) > > Kind regards, > Jamie By the way I filed this bug report about 2 weeks ago but it went unnoticed: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285902 Akemi