On 01/10/2015 01:36 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 01/09/2015 10:50 PM, PatrickD Garvey wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 3:01 AM, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org> wrote: >>> On 01/05/2015 05:30 PM, PatrickD Garvey wrote: >>>> CentOS and for solutions to support requests, why is it maintained >>>> outside the CentOS.org domain? >>> I guess you could extend that to github.com and then most of the stuff >>> going on there would be wrong according to you as well right ? >>> >>> -- >>> Karanbir Singh >> Sorry for the slow response when you're answering my question. >> >> According to the FAQ < >> http://community.redhat.com/centos-faq/#_git_centos_org >, >> "git.centos.org ... is the canonical repository for the CentOS >> Project, and for SIGs working on variants." So, yes, I would expect >> anything that is regularly used in building CentOS or proposed as >> support items for CentOS' use by the community to be readily available >> on git.centos.org. > nothing on nazar should be consider centos 'project' assets. its my > personal stuff, just like everything else karan.org would be. I am > struggling to see why you might be confused by that. > > > I assume the confusion is triggered by us ( me ) recommending something from your personal web site rather than from one "fully blessed " by CentOS ( whatever that would mean )