On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Manuel Wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> wrote: > On 01/10/2015 01:36 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote: >> >> On 01/09/2015 10:50 PM, PatrickD Garvey wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 3:01 AM, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 01/05/2015 05:30 PM, PatrickD Garvey wrote: >>>>> >>>>> CentOS and for solutions to support requests, why is it maintained >>>>> outside the CentOS.org domain? >>>> >>>> I guess you could extend that to github.com and then most of the stuff >>>> going on there would be wrong according to you as well right ? >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Karanbir Singh >>> >>> Sorry for the slow response when you're answering my question. >>> >>> According to the FAQ < >>> http://community.redhat.com/centos-faq/#_git_centos_org >, >>> "git.centos.org ... is the canonical repository for the CentOS >>> Project, and for SIGs working on variants." So, yes, I would expect >>> anything that is regularly used in building CentOS or proposed as >>> support items for CentOS' use by the community to be readily available >>> on git.centos.org. >> >> nothing on nazar should be consider centos 'project' assets. its my >> personal stuff, just like everything else karan.org would be. I am >> struggling to see why you might be confused by that. >> >> >> > I assume the confusion is triggered by us ( me ) recommending something from > your personal web site rather than from one "fully blessed " by CentOS ( > whatever that would mean ) > That would be the short version of what I just posted.