[CentOS-devel] Including rkt in virt7 - yay/nay?

[Joe Brockmeier]

On 07/02/2015 10:17 PM, Lokesh Mandvekar wrote:
> Wondering if people would be ok with including rkt in virt7 SIG repos.
> some folks gave this a yay on IRC, but reaching out to the mailing list as
> well for more votes.

I'm +1 for having it, either in the virt or Atomic SIG repos. My
interest is primarily in being able to include it in the 4-week CentOS
Atomic builds for folks who want to use rkt. Not sure how rkt
does/doesn't line up with the goals of the virt SIG.

Best,

jzb
-- 
Joe Brockmeier | Community Team, OSAS
jzb at redhat.com | http://community.redhat.com/
Twitter: @jzb  | http://dissociatedpress.net/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20150707/52f69428/attachment.sig>