On Jul 6, 2015 7:34 PM, "Jason Brooks" <jbrooks at redhat.com> wrote: > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Lokesh Mandvekar" <lsm5 at fedoraproject.org> > > To: centos-devel at centos.org > > Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2015 2:17:04 PM > > Subject: [CentOS-devel] Including rkt in virt7 - yay/nay? > > > > Wondering if people would be ok with including rkt in virt7 SIG repos. > > some folks gave this a yay on IRC, but reaching out to the mailing list as > > well for more votes. > > +1 +1 here too > > > > > rkt is _not_ in fedora yet and including it would also imply including > > systemd >= 220 in virt7 as it isn't present in base CentOS. > > > > All the gory detail around rkt packaging for fedora can be found here: > > https://github.com/coreos/rkt/issues/686 . The main > > pending issue that fedora won't agree to right now is > > RE: installing the stage1 rootfs tarball at rpm install time. > > > > WIP rpm files are here: https://github.com/fedora-cloud/rkt-rpm/ . I've been > > adding these to my copr repo here: > > https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/lsm5/rkt/ . markllama and lalatenduM > > might have something to add to this. > > -- > > Lokesh > > Freenode, OFTC: lsm5 > > GPG: 0xC7C3A0DD > > > > _______________________________________________ > > CentOS-devel mailing list > > CentOS-devel at centos.org > > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel > > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20150706/c6c049f0/attachment-0008.html>