On 07/02/2015 04:17 PM, Lokesh Mandvekar wrote: > Wondering if people would be ok with including rkt in virt7 SIG repos. > some folks gave this a yay on IRC, but reaching out to the mailing list as > well for more votes. > > rkt is _not_ in fedora yet and including it would also imply including > systemd >= 220 in virt7 as it isn't present in base CentOS. My only concerns about this would be unintended breakage due to feature changes. There's quite a bit in systemd that gets disabled or otherwise turned off. I'm okay with including it, but there should be testing with it as well. > All the gory detail around rkt packaging for fedora can be found here: > https://github.com/coreos/rkt/issues/686 . The main > pending issue that fedora won't agree to right now is > RE: installing the stage1 rootfs tarball at rpm install time. Ugh, that's not overly nice. So long as this is being resolved/fixed upstream, I'm okay with it. > WIP rpm files are here: https://github.com/fedora-cloud/rkt-rpm/ . I've been > adding these to my copr repo here: > https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/lsm5/rkt/ . markllama and lalatenduM > might have something to add to this. -- Jim Perrin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77