On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 06:04:40PM +0100, Louis Taylor wrote: > On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 05:32:49PM +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote: > > absolutely. there was quite a bit of talk around setting up a shared cal > > - but that got blocked on the lack of a central auth setup. Which in > > turn is starting to 'get there', so we should have something on the cal > > side as well down the road. > > Why do you need a central auth system for that? In openstack, we just have > meetings managed in a bunch of yaml files in a git repo. Some tooling generates > an ical file off this and prevents collisions. I'm not sure this approach is > suitable for centos, but it's been working out well for openstack. > > See: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/CreateaMeeting Because back then the question was about adopting fedocal that uses openid for authentication and authorization. The usual links: https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedocal https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar Pierre -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 181 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20150608/96d9fa62/attachment-0008.sig>