On Jun 8, 2015, at 7:04 PM, Louis Taylor <louis at kragniz.eu> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 05:32:49PM +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote: >> absolutely. there was quite a bit of talk around setting up a shared cal >> - but that got blocked on the lack of a central auth setup. Which in >> turn is starting to 'get there', so we should have something on the cal >> side as well down the road. > > Why do you need a central auth system for that? In openstack, we just have > meetings managed in a bunch of yaml files in a git repo. Some tooling generates > an ical file off this and prevents collisions. I'm not sure this approach is > suitable for centos, but it's been working out well for openstack. > > See: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/CreateaMeeting Something like this would seem to be a good stop gap. Is this something people would support as an interim measure? regards, bex -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 496 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20150608/3f895ffc/attachment-0008.sig>