On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:09:12AM -0700, Karsten Wade wrote: > First, the flag being *_cla continues to create an impression that > there is a CLA in Fedora; note that in fact the Subject: of this > thread is really a misnomer. I think it makes for a prejudiced reading. https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/4806 > Second, the only problem I've ever had with the FPCA is that it is > written as a legal document, so causes people's eyes to glaze over. > I've got an alternative to consider, which is a bit easier to read and > accomplishes the same thing. I wrote it with Richard Fontana, who was > lead author and legal counsel on the FPCA. If Richard is interested in going through this again with Fedora, I won't say no. :) > It doesn't need to be a complicated policy (read the above, IMO it > accomplishes what the FPCA does in fewer words.) Honestly, I think that once one gets through the gigantic "Terms" section Fedora has, and over the monospace formatting, it's really no more or less complicated. But whatever. :) -- Matthew Miller <mattdm at fedoraproject.org> Fedora Project Leader