-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 06/29/2015 11:54 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:09:12AM -0700, Karsten Wade wrote: >> First, the flag being *_cla continues to create an impression >> that there is a CLA in Fedora; note that in fact the Subject: of >> this thread is really a misnomer. I think it makes for a >> prejudiced reading. > > https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/4806 > >> Second, the only problem I've ever had with the FPCA is that it >> is written as a legal document, so causes people's eyes to glaze >> over. I've got an alternative to consider, which is a bit easier >> to read and accomplishes the same thing. I wrote it with Richard >> Fontana, who was lead author and legal counsel on the FPCA. > > If Richard is interested in going through this again with Fedora, > I won't say no. :) Sounds like something the Board should look at. With the precedence of inbound == outbound we may have all we need right there. >> It doesn't need to be a complicated policy (read the above, IMO >> it accomplishes what the FPCA does in fewer words.) > > Honestly, I think that once one gets through the gigantic "Terms" > section Fedora has, and over the monospace formatting, it's really > no more or less complicated. But whatever. :) Actually you are right, the core of it is all similar (theopensourceway.org one came later iirc), without the "Terms" section that I think strikes the fear in hearts of many. And glaze ... - - Karsten - -- Karsten 'quaid' Wade .^\ CentOS Doer of Stuff http://TheOpenSourceWay.org \ http://community.redhat.com @quaid (identi.ca/twitter/IRC) \v' gpg: AD0E0C41 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlWRmLwACgkQ2ZIOBq0ODEE/QQCggfgLVZdai1b7ZQ1dzlOSmUWK viIAn2szx40GDYmdphe1nbanYv3klNeD =0StD -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----