[CentOS-devel] moving from gitorious
Karsten Wade
kwade at redhat.com
Fri Mar 6 19:57:24 UTC 2015
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 03/06/2015 07:21 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 03/05/2015 09:26 PM, Karsten Wade wrote:
>> I'll give a +0 explained this way:
>>
>> There is a risk with using GitHub's services under a few
>> conditions:
>>
>> * We get reliant on the proprietary workflow software. * We allow
>> it to become a canonical source. * Our use of the service is seen
>> as tacit or explicit support of their company or model of working
>> with open source software.
>
> as we move from gitorious.org, so we can move from github should
> there be a need.
Thanks, yes, that's the gist of it.
I appreciate greatly that everyone here understands the value of open
source and avoiding lock-in and such. I'll often make a point about
such things just to "wave the flag" so to speak -- make a clear point
in the public record about our stance on freedom, etc. So if people
say, in this example, "Look, CentOS Project is embracing GitHub," we
have a discussion thread to point to.
Regards,
- - Karsten
- --
Karsten 'quaid' Wade .^\ CentOS Doer of Stuff
http://TheOpenSourceWay.org \ http://community.redhat.com
@quaid (identi.ca/twitter/IRC) \v' gpg: AD0E0C41
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
iEUEARECAAYFAlT6BqQACgkQ2ZIOBq0ODEEeXQCXSPFoNecToWgwcbQ2Y/XWEW7+
FgCfeWTMxiJOzspMKh0VSFs5JQfNRxQ=
=fjXi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the CentOS-devel
mailing list