[CentOS-devel] moving from gitorious

[Jason Brooks]

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Karsten Wade" <kwade at redhat.com>
> To: centos-devel at centos.org
> Sent: Friday, March 6, 2015 11:57:24 AM
> Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] moving from gitorious
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On 03/06/2015 07:21 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> > On 03/05/2015 09:26 PM, Karsten Wade wrote:
> >> I'll give a +0 explained this way:
> >> 
> >> There is a risk with using GitHub's services under a few
> >> conditions:
> >> 
> >> * We get reliant on the proprietary workflow software. * We allow
> >> it to become a canonical source. * Our use of the service is seen
> >> as tacit or explicit support of their company or model of working
> >> with open source software.
> > 
> > as we move from gitorious.org, so we can move from github should
> > there be a need.
> 
> Thanks, yes, that's the gist of it.
> 
> I appreciate greatly that everyone here understands the value of open
> source and avoiding lock-in and such. I'll often make a point about
> such things just to "wave the flag" so to speak -- make a clear point
> in the public record about our stance on freedom, etc. So if people
> say, in this example, "Look, CentOS Project is embracing GitHub," we
> have a discussion thread to point to.

Should we be more explicitly considering gitlab.com then? There's 
a conversion path from gitorious.

Jason


> 
> Regards,
> 
> - - Karsten
> - --
> Karsten 'quaid' Wade        .^\          CentOS Doer of Stuff
> http://TheOpenSourceWay.org    \  http://community.redhat.com
> @quaid (identi.ca/twitter/IRC)  \v'             gpg: AD0E0C41
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1
> 
> iEUEARECAAYFAlT6BqQACgkQ2ZIOBq0ODEEeXQCXSPFoNecToWgwcbQ2Y/XWEW7+
> FgCfeWTMxiJOzspMKh0VSFs5JQfNRxQ=
> =fjXi
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS-devel mailing list
> CentOS-devel at centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
>