On 03/04/2015 06:42 AM, Honza Horak wrote: > There is also another idea Remi suggested.. It's basically about having > 3 repositories: > > - centos-scl => downstream of RHSCL, same content, only for CentOS users > > - centos-scl-devel / testing => upstream of RHSCL (we need to ensure > that NEVR in this repo < previous one) and perhaps additional packages > (for CentOS and RHSCL users) > > - centos-scl-sig / additional / stable => package NOT in RHSCL. This can > be used by CentOS and RHSCL users. I like this idea, but I'm not crazy about the name of the last one, as it's not entirely clear what it is. I might suggest centos-scl-sup(plementary). You guys are the SIG. These packages would supplement what exists already. This would be a good repo for the 500-odd perl module scl packages we've been contacted about as well. -- Jim Perrin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77