On 03/04/2015 12:56 PM, Jim Perrin wrote: > > > On 03/04/2015 06:42 AM, Honza Horak wrote: > >> There is also another idea Remi suggested.. It's basically about having >> 3 repositories: >> >> - centos-scl => downstream of RHSCL, same content, only for CentOS users >> >> - centos-scl-devel / testing => upstream of RHSCL (we need to ensure >> that NEVR in this repo < previous one) and perhaps additional packages >> (for CentOS and RHSCL users) >> >> - centos-scl-sig / additional / stable => package NOT in RHSCL. This can >> be used by CentOS and RHSCL users. > > > I like this idea, but I'm not crazy about the name of the last one, as > it's not entirely clear what it is. I might suggest > centos-scl-sup(plementary). You guys are the SIG. These packages would > supplement what exists already. > > This would be a good repo for the 500-odd perl module scl packages we've > been contacted about as well. why not just put these in CentOS-Extras/ ? that only has content not otherwise in the distro upstream. -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc