On 03/04/2015 07:10 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 03/04/2015 12:56 PM, Jim Perrin wrote: >> >> >> On 03/04/2015 06:42 AM, Honza Horak wrote: >> >>> There is also another idea Remi suggested.. It's basically about having >>> 3 repositories: >>> >>> - centos-scl => downstream of RHSCL, same content, only for CentOS users >>> >>> - centos-scl-devel / testing => upstream of RHSCL (we need to ensure >>> that NEVR in this repo < previous one) and perhaps additional packages >>> (for CentOS and RHSCL users) >>> >>> - centos-scl-sig / additional / stable => package NOT in RHSCL. This can >>> be used by CentOS and RHSCL users. >> >> >> I like this idea, but I'm not crazy about the name of the last one, as >> it's not entirely clear what it is. I might suggest >> centos-scl-sup(plementary). You guys are the SIG. These packages would >> supplement what exists already. >> >> This would be a good repo for the 500-odd perl module scl packages we've >> been contacted about as well. > > why not just put these in CentOS-Extras/ ? that only has content not > otherwise in the distro upstream. This should be sig specific, and requires sig content. I don't think Extras would be a viable solution here. -- Jim Perrin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77