-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 03/06/2015 07:21 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 03/05/2015 09:26 PM, Karsten Wade wrote: >> I'll give a +0 explained this way: >> >> There is a risk with using GitHub's services under a few >> conditions: >> >> * We get reliant on the proprietary workflow software. * We allow >> it to become a canonical source. * Our use of the service is seen >> as tacit or explicit support of their company or model of working >> with open source software. > > as we move from gitorious.org, so we can move from github should > there be a need. Thanks, yes, that's the gist of it. I appreciate greatly that everyone here understands the value of open source and avoiding lock-in and such. I'll often make a point about such things just to "wave the flag" so to speak -- make a clear point in the public record about our stance on freedom, etc. So if people say, in this example, "Look, CentOS Project is embracing GitHub," we have a discussion thread to point to. Regards, - - Karsten - -- Karsten 'quaid' Wade .^\ CentOS Doer of Stuff http://TheOpenSourceWay.org \ http://community.redhat.com @quaid (identi.ca/twitter/IRC) \v' gpg: AD0E0C41 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEUEARECAAYFAlT6BqQACgkQ2ZIOBq0ODEEeXQCXSPFoNecToWgwcbQ2Y/XWEW7+ FgCfeWTMxiJOzspMKh0VSFs5JQfNRxQ= =fjXi -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----